Philosophical problems for people with religious beliefs Essay

* In what ways might flagitious and suffering create philosophical problems for people with ghostly beliefs? Outline two solutions to these problems( 21 )* To what extent be these solutions successful?( 9 )1. Suffering can bring on totally sorts of problems that can shake peoples religious beliefs. Evil and suffering create problems in peoples creed because they pay lost psyche or they have suffered particular severeness in their life and they wish to sentence someone or something for their personalized suffering and this is normally deity. If someone close to a person dies and that person is religious or has been brought up in a faith even if they have lapsed it will make them doubt their faith even though we drive in that everyone has to die someday precisely it is never the right judgment of conviction to loose someone you rage.And because of this people blame God or if they have a faith it may make them feel that beau imaginationl is non there. This is the issu e of the inconsistent triad. The triad says that god is all loving all powerful and all knowing. If this is current would an all loving God let innocent people suffer at the hands of unhealthiness and natural disasters. And if he is all loving and he wouldnt want us to suffer give care this he might not know it was happening and so the second angle of the triangle is disproved and in conclusion if he is both all loving and all-knowing he would not want people to obtain hurt and he knew it was happening so maybe it is the fact that he simply wants to help but he cannot as he is not all powerful.The inconsistent triad is a very outstanding philosophical problem as it is a very logical series of suggestions and clearms perfectly logical that if you love someone you wouldnt want them to be hurt if you knew it was happening and more than importantly you had the power to erupt it why wouldnt you especially if you loved that person. This is then used to say that if God is not all of these things then he is not God. This sums up nicely the flaw in all religion. If you say your God loves you and they are all powerful then why do they allow people, innocent people to suffer. excessively the second problem with the morality of diabolical and suffering that can hurt religious beliefs is the issue of unreciprocated prayers. If someone is praying that their friend or relative wont die of an illness or something along those lines if they do people ofttimes turn aside from god because they feel he is not listening because what they asked for had not been granted. And again this relates back to the inconsistent triad as if he can hear the prayers and if he loves the people who ask him and plead him for help and he ignores them and lets people die maybe he isnt all powerful or isnt all loving.Some theists respond that a perfect cosmos may still allow some diabolic, asserting that it will en subject certain greater goods, much(prenominal) as free will, which can not be achieved without allowing some evils. A theodicy, on the other hand, is an blast to provide such(prenominal) justifications for the domain of evil. Richard Swinburne maintains that it does not make sense to assume there are such greater goods, unless we know what they are, i.e., we have a successful theodicy. creationy contemporary philosophers disagree. Skeptical theism, which is based on the theological position that homos can never expect to understand the divine, is perhaps the most pop response to the problem of evil among contemporary philosophers of religion. unless how do we truly explain the problem of evil and suffering especially in relation to the existence and power of god. Swinburne also once said in a cool moment we must provide a satisfactory answer for atheists. I reckon that this concept could also be applied to the theists who are suffering or are questioning god as a result of evil and suffering. To deal with the issue of theist faith suffering as the result of suffering we must address the objections to the problem.These are universey and varied for example Christian scientists often say that God cannot exist due to the logical problem of the inconsistent triad whereby the two claims negatives the troika and therefore the existence of a perfect god. The existence of evil is of course the strongest objection and causes the most problems for faith. But there are some types of evil there is natural evil, god created a flawed and delicate area. There is also moral evil why did god create people capable of doing such terrible things but this comes d declare to the issue of free will in mankind. But overall evil is the min reason for philosophical problems in beliefs.This is often countered by some theists saying that maybe god is making us suffer out of love. In irenaean theodicy it is considered and based upon the fact that our god is a personal god unlike in the Augustinian theodicy where god seems more disinterested and d istant. It is implied that god loved his creation. god looked upon what he had done and he saw it was very good( the book of coevals).and because he loved us so much he wanted us to have the chance to create our perfect soul through with(predicate) an imperfect origination with challenges to receive the ultimate reward of a perfect soul. So we suffer for a positive purpose or outcome.Professor conjuration Hick developed the soul making theodicy. John Hick call backs that in order for moral growth to compact place it is important that pitying worlds beings are created at a knowledge distance from God. This knowledge means that human beings do not know whether God exists and so this knowledge gap means that human beings are genuinely free and have space to grow and mature through making their own moral choices. Irenaeus, a Church Father. Believed that human beings have a two stage process of moral development, having been created in the image and likeness of God. (Genesis 12 6). Created in the image of God, human beings have potential, which they may achieve in this world as they begin to grow into the likeness of God, thus fulfilling their potential. This two stage process of moral development is compared to growing from a child into an adult through our moral choices.St irenaues also suggested that evil could be tracked back to human free will.he differed from Augustine by saying that god did not make a perfect world and that evil has a valuable part to play in gods plans for humanity. Irenaeus said that god was part responsible for evil. In the sense that god created worldly concern imperfectly in order that they could develop into perfection. His own image but with the intention of letting them develop into his likeness or perfection of character later. macrocosm in gods image means that you have intelligence, morality, personality, but perfection would only be accomplished as humanity was changed into gods likeness developing over time. God cou ldnt have created humans in perfection because attaining the likeness of god needed the willing cooperation of human individuals. Moreover freedom requires the possibility of choosing well instead of evil and therefore god had to permit evil and suffering to occur.St Augustine lived in the ordinal century and it was his concept that god was perfect the world was perfect and it was mans evil that caused this to break. God brought the world into existence from nothing (ex nihilo) the fall itself is chapter three of genesis. Augustine taught that following the fall the devil tempted decade and eve to eat the yield from the tree of knowledge the fruit from the knowledge tree.The fruit which god had forbidden Adam and eve to eat. netherworld is the definition of the will of a rational being away from god which is motivated by rob hubris. Augustine believed that original sin was passed down through the act of sexual intercourse so that every human being, as descendants of Adam and ev e suffer from original sin. Humanity has a tendency towards sin. Man wants to sin. The good that I would I cannot. Evil is a privation of goodness. Evil doesnt exist as a substance of his own right. Augustine described sin as a falling short or missing the mark of that which god intends. Augustine believed that the ugliness of sin is never without the beauty of visitmentIn the scientific age of the twenty- offshoot century people no daylong believe in angels. The whole idea of the fall is nonsensical and is only fit for a pre-scientific view of the world. Similarly people no longer believe in the devil. Augustines theodicy depends on his assumption that the world was made perfect. This is contradicted by Charles Darwins hypothesis of evolution and natural selection. The story of Adam and Eve is not historically true, it is a myth. The teaching of real blurt is not Biblical, but comes from St Augustine. The idea that the human race is fallen, as we inherit Original Sin from Adam and Eve is both Scientifically nonsensical and Even if it were true it is highly unfair to punish the offspring (the human race) for a sin committed by their parents, i.e. Adam and Eve.2. As we see bother and suffering around us in the so called perfect world that God created and we feel a need to justify why this is happening and more importantly who fault it is. This is where god comes into the equation, the designer of the worldly concern and an all knowing being who loves us all no mater who we are. The mere idea of distressingness in this world with this being calls into question the very existence of what our existence is and how it came to be. The definition of a divinity is to prove the divine attributes of god and when one sees death in ones family could one ever possibly see a vindication of evils existence?In analysis both theodicys one must take into consideration the historical context in which both were conceived and pen. With sophisticated scientific knowledge we have com to believe that the universe came into existence through the with child(p) bang. Consequently many have discredited the possibility of the genesis version of creation. The Augustine theodicy is therefore open to much modern day speculation and criticism, as it is based on the belief that man established evil due to a conscious decision made by Adam and eve under temptation from Lucifer.This is the fall and when human existence supposedly turned away from the grace of God. In todays more logical and pragmatic society the idea of mans creation through such events is considered to be nothing more than mythological farce. Where the text should not simply be discredited but is more of a symbol in this case to Christianity. In discrediting the source of the theodicy therefore one considers what remains of Augustine theodicy ineffective due to our lack of belief in the first premise. The point to consider is if one is a traditional catholic and believes that this is the word o f God or hold one takes a more modern stance on the issue and learns from scientific growth of the modern era.However scientist still struggle to provide a true explanation for the cause of the big bang, had Augustine been able to see these modern times he may have argued the point that when the fall happened (the expulsion of Adam and eve from the garden.) the big bang would have occurred. This is very open to interpretation as it is now a certainty that the story of Adam and eve is a metaphorical device to explain the beginning of the world to people who were simpler than todays standards. What is clear is that the Augustine theodicy is a very traditionalist approach to the idea of evil. Whereas the irenaean theodicy was written before the Augustine theodicy it is actually a more modern in its approach to the problem of evil and suffering.In these modern times under newer scientific evidence such as the theory of evolution and the big bang theory St Iranians theodicy was cast int o new philosophical light. It was shown to be a schedule before its time as it draws from an original state of imperfection in the universe. Which then has to work towards perfection? Her is so much evil in todays society we can see many natural evil. In contrast to natural evil one cannot but help agree that the world is not perfect. In contrast to natural evil occurring due to a delicate balance being lost in the world the idea of an imperfect world working towards perfection appears far more feasible.To conclude one must draw to the evident change in sociological and intellectual factors from the time of Irenaeus and Augustine. Although both when written may have proved strong vindification for moral and natural evil in the case of the existence of god mans growth appears to change the significance of each thing in the universe.